Update of a 1992 Comp Plan for county in the Sun Belt: e.g. Prima County, AZ.
• Look at population projections
• Look at the population methods
o Look out for
• 1990 census to project 2010 cohort survival analysis
• cohort survival, look at the likelihood of survival of age groups and derive your population pyramids
doesn’t take into account migration
• old people are moving there
• Mexicans
Focuses mostly on women’s fertility is 2.1 kids
• Rate of Growth in U.S. from 1990 to 2000 was 13.2% or a little more than 1.1%/year
• US and Canada are the fastest growing populations in the industrialized world
o Look out for a trend line analysis
• 1970, 1980, 1990 → extrapolate from there
• in-migration is key to taking apart the exponential trend analysis
• Policy Based Method
o Takes into account land use availability
• Doubt they used it
What would our strategy be?
• Design based
• Location
• Carrying Capacity
• Estimated population
o American community survey
o School enrollment
o Housing permits
o Public Utility Co → addresses, households
• Assumptions to project to 2030
o Immigration/out migration
o Land use
o Economic activity
o Aging pop
o Climate
o Scenarios/alternatives: the good, the bad, and the ugly/high, low, medium.
• Does population just happen? Or can you use the comp plan or the projection to control
What is Your Vision
- And how does the current size and diversity and age of your pop fit that vision?
- And how many people do you want and what type in 20 years?
- What is the optimal population?
- A number of communities will reach build out in our lifetime.
- county can buy land
- make growth boundaries
- The hear ot fht Comp Plan Process
- Key for land use and other
Population Projection Methods
- Something to consider: are you trying to come up with a single population number for a certain future date?
- Are you looking at a range of possibilities ans selecting the most likely population change scenario?
- Simple extrapoalation of population trend
- linear extrapolation: oppulation will change by the same number of people in each future year as the averagae annual change during the previous
- linear extrapolation ain't good
- Actual population change vs. projected
- risk and uncertainty: catastrophic events
- faster growing communities have larger estimate errors
- larger pop have smaller errors
- the more migration is a factor, the greater errors are likely to be listed above
- the farther you go out in time the greater the errors of your projections
- complex extrapolation: regression, times series data
- structural models: Impact of employment growth, household size, land use
- note: simple population projection methods can be just as accurate as complex methods
- 1%,2%, 3% growth rates over 20 years: and the Rule of 70 (in 10 years your pop will double if you grow at ten percent)
- if your pop grows at 5% for 20 years
- Dominant development form: urban suburban infill and limited expansion, new villages, sprawl
- Water quality impact: impervious surface and on-site septics-water supply
- land consumption
- infrastructure costs
- when build-out will be reached
No comments:
Post a Comment